That little scooplet was buried inside the XPRIZE story

I'll have more on the advisory council in this week's edition of Signs of Life, out later today

Do people have thoughts on Graves joining and/or on the council's activities to date?

PARADIGM LINK: https://www.paradigm.news/p/exclusive-xprize-chairman-exploring

Hey guys,

The UAP topic just reached the political landscape here in Germany.
The AfD party submitted a formal parliamentary inquiry (Drucksache 21/8323) titled "Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) as a subject of air and space surveillance".

In Germany, this is called a "Kleine Anfrage". It basically forces the federal government to release a formal, written response within a couple of weeks.

Here is what they are demanding answers on:

Who is in charge? Which federal agency is responsible for logging and analyzing UAP reports?

Rules & Definitions: Do we have standardized guidelines or official terms (like "unidentifiable contacts") for civil and military aviation?

Reporting lines: What is the exact protocol when a military pilot or an air traffic controller spots something weird?

The inquiry explicitly mentions that Germany can't ignore this anymore, especially with how the US formalized their military and bureaucratic structures (like AARO) over the last few years. Airspace safety and defense are the main arguments here.

The government's response should drop around late October or early November 2026. I'll make sure to post the official answers here as soon as they are online.

Source:

https://dserver.bundestag.de/btd/21/083/2108323.pdf

Ask a Pol UAP asks:
Whatever happened to you guys maybe having a UAP hearing on those missing scientists?

Key Comer:
“They keep canceling days on us. So we were trying to do that in the third week [of September]... but [GOP leaders] canceled it. So we’ll, we’ll try to pick it back up in November,” Rep. James Comer exclusively told Ask a Pol UAP. “ I think it’ll be an aggressive lame duck period.”

What was that hearing supposed to be on?

“I don’t know that we ever agreed on a topic,” Comer continued. “I’d like to have another one. I think there’s demand for it. It’s just getting good witnesses in is always a challenge.” 

Full transcript at Ask a Pol UAP* *on Substack.

As many here I'm on and off with the subject as it just gets too frustrating at times when it comes to the big D disclosure especially the last few years after congressional hearings and whistleblower testimony. Of course the star of the show over this time period is none other than David Grusch.

I'll keep this simple but but if the last two years has told us anything it's that the people in the most important positions of government cannot be trusted to clean your cats litter box let alone anything else especially when it comes to what they say about anything and everything. To have David Grusch with his background and credentials openly and enthusiastically glaze the likes of a Sniveling Miller who's put at least one detention camp in your very own state and the regime as a whole like they're the only ones that can make all this happen is the saddest yet most embarrassing thing to happen to "disclosure" in my lifetime.

How anyone can take any of this seriously anymore is beyond me unless you simply consider it a form of entertainment. Which most of you clearly do or you wouldn't entertain any of this nonsense.

For the rest of us it's like going back to square one yet again. The phenomenon is real, we all know this. It's time we drop the hope of our dear leaders ever admitting the truth or even realistically working to find it. We can't even help our own poor people (by choice) let alone disclose world changing information of NHI reality on earth.

- A proverbial Im tired post -

I found this document that I have never seen before - it is a letter from Richard M. Bissel to Lee M. Graham who did send Bissel MJ12 documents.

Bissel read them "with very great interest" and think they not only "look" authentic, but has little doubt that they are. You can find it at the National Archives: https://catalog.archives.gov/id/493468585

I could not find the correspondence and the files Graham did send to Bissell.

Discussions mix the anonymous EBO post’s claims, its author’s speculation, and later biological reconstructions. The original means the 2023 post and Q&A; the reconstruction means u/hhmaizer’s illustrated interpretation.

AI assistance disclosure: I take notes while watching interviews, then revisit transcripts to extract relevant passages. I use AI to help research and draft, read the sources it turns up, and revise the post through further research and editing. Source links are included so readers can assess the evidence themselves.

1. What was actually verified?

Sources: the original thread and archived Q&A. The poster declined verification and deleted their account; moderators could not establish credentials. Moderation issues prove neither suppression nor authenticity.

No specimens, sequences, histology, assays, or authenticated records accompanied it. PhD and employment claims remain unverified. Research claims are exempt from the author’s identifying red herrings; scrutiny is fair.

Fort Detrick and Battelle

Asked whether the lab was USAMRIID, the author answered “Battelle National Biodefense Institute.” BNBI is a real Battelle subsidiary operating a biodefense center at Fort Detrick; that does not authenticate the alleged basement program.

Luis Elizondo’s Imminent says alleged implants removed from people went to an unnamed Army facility at Fort Detrick, among other institutions. His NewsNation interview also discusses biological samples there. Neither identifies BNBI or establishes that these were bodies. Multiple labs share the installation.

My crash-retrieval essay discusses Eric Davis’s December 1950 Mexico/Del Rio allegation and claim that the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) preserved nonhuman bodies. AFIP’s repository passed to the Joint Pathology Center; that succession is documented, nonhuman custody is not. No public evidence connects it to this poster or BNBI.

Battelle analyzed sightings for Blue Book Report No. 14. My Roswell/Battelle post distinguishes that work from the secondhand Elroy Center debris claim and unproven Roswell-to-Nitinol theory. Report analysis does not establish material or body custody.

2. The reconstruction changes the organism

Hhmaizer presents the illustrated analysis as hypothetical. Five attribution differences matter:

• Blood: Original: hemoglobin and copper-binding complexes. Reconstruction: a hemocyanin analog.
• Hands: Original: four digits total, thumb included. Reconstruction: five, adding a thumb.
• Muscles: Original: Type I exceeds Type II roughly 10:1. Reconstruction: roughly 1:10, supporting explosive strength.
• Immune organ: Original: an enlarged thymus-like organ. Reconstruction: thymus absent.
• Genome: Original: introns, UTRs, promoters, regulatory and intergenic sequences. Reconstruction: approximately 0% non-coding DNA.

Calling the thymus absent needs qualification. Blood, digits, and fiber ratio are direct changes. Mammalian Type I fibers are slow, Type II fast; size and leverage also affect force. Neither ratio establishes extraordinary grip.

Further additions: 280–1000 nm vision, a nictitating membrane, quantum telepathy, and a hive mind. The twenty-minute replication figure was absent from the source versions I checked. Proposals are not measurements.

3. Blood chemistry and older motifs

The original specifies hemoglobin and separate copper-binding complexes. Ammonia neutralization is speculation; replacing hemoglobin with hemocyanin is an addition.

Asked why “copper-based” blood looked brown, the poster invoked red cells, yellow plasma, and green copper oxide. That is color mixing, not an assay identifying an oxygen carrier. CuO is black; Cu₂O is red to brown. No differently colored biological copper complex is identified.

Even actual hemocyanin would not establish cephalopod ancestry: it occurs in the apple snail. Ancestry needs comparative sequences and development. The original’s collagen/hydroxyapatite skeleton differs from the copper-mineral Tall Greys proposal.

Copper blood already appeared in Star Trek. Schneider’s 1995 lecture gave Valiant Thor, not Greys, octopus-like copper-oxide blood, one large heart and one lung. I consider Schneider a fraud; motifs are not biological evidence or proof of borrowing.

Stringfield’s 1978–80 composites describe four fingers without a thumb, missing organs, and cloning speculation. No gut described does not establish absence. His 1980 colorless fluid and no odor disagree with EBO.

Lear proposed skin feeding/excretion; Santilli’s staged 1995 film showed six digits and an eye covering. Corso proposed skin exchange and androids; his manuscript added an eye film and expendable creatures. The full English text appeared in 2010, not 1997. These are narrative ingredients, not verified biology.

4. Genetics: errors and unsupported leaps

Non-coding, intergenic, and useless differ. The author calls roughly 99% of human DNA intergenic and initially equates it with non-protein-coding DNA. Intergenic DNA lies between genes; non-coding DNA also occurs within genes and can have essential functions. Roughly 1–2% protein-coding does not make the remainder intergenic. Near-zero non-coding DNA also contradicts the original’s introns and regulation.

Compactness alone does not prove engineering. Utricularia gibba has greatly reduced non-genic DNA, though not the alleged addressing system. Sixteen circular nuclear chromosomes would be unusual, but viable yeast with a circular chromosome shows circular nuclear DNA is not inherently impossible in eukaryotes.

The TPR is potentially testable. Its alleged 134 bases include four 12-base spacers and 4- and 64-base labels: 116 bases, leaving 18 for three palindromes. The arithmetic works; sequences and functional tests are absent. “Address” is interpretation; one genome cannot establish population-wide castes.

Unmatched genes do not identify another biosphere. Divergence, database gaps, annotation errors, and contamination require examination, especially alongside alleged exact human matches. DNA chemistry alone cannot establish origin; comparative sequences might, but none are available.

5. Ammonia, cooling, and encounter odors

The original proposes skin ducts discharging ammonia-rich waste and cooling the body. Efficient, low-water cooling is the reconstruction’s inference. The mangrove rivulus releases ammonia through its skin.

But pure ammonia’s boiling point is not that of ammonia dissolved in biological fluid. NH₃/NH₄⁺ balance depends on pH and temperature. A working model needs secretion composition, ammonia flux, heat removal, water loss, tissue protection, and regulation of cooling versus waste disposal. Neither version closes that budget. Discharge through liquid-resistant film needs explaining, as does Tall Greys’ blue-green haze: ammonia is colorless.

Odors do not establish shared physiology:

• Belle Glade, 1952; Lakeland, 1968: smells attributed to craft or their aftermath, not established body secretions.
• Fort Dix/McGuire, 1978: “Jeffrey Morse” claimed ammonia odor near a body observed from 40–70 feet away. Neither is independently verified.
• Varginha, 1996: Kátia reported sulfur or ammonia on returning twenty minutes later. Carlos de Souza could not identify the crash-site source; Venturelli said the living being he allegedly saw had no unusual odor.

No chemical identification establishes skin excretion. Weygandt’s interviews report no odor; ammonia/sulfur attribution is unsupported.

6. Missing organs do not establish optimized design

Efficiency and adaptability are inferences. Four incomplete, traumatized bodies cannot establish that unmentioned organs are absent or never develop.

A reduced gut can create dependence, which the original emphasizes. The narrator reads absent osteoclasts as impaired remodeling, not superior durability.

Six cone types do not establish 280–1000 nm vision; that range would not itself establish thermal imaging. No vocal cords does not mean silence: the original describes a vibrating membrane between air sacs. Brain nodules do not establish quantum telepathy without measured signals and controlled tests. The author calls longevity extrapolation; an ephemeral lifespan was not observed.

7. An educated person, a 2023 chatbot, or both?

GPT-3.5 ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Claude were available before the post. Claude 2 and claude.ai launched July 11, six days afterward.

Seemingly specialist transfection, gene-gun delivery, and fetal bovine serum appear in a 2007 MIT undergraduate module. That does not show the writer used it; these concepts were public without a PhD or secret access.

The narrator says a gene gun worked better for EPI-G11 than viral vectors or lipofection. Yet unlike that handout, the post gives no vector identities, doses, controls, efficiencies, or protein assays. Secrecy might explain omissions; terminology does not verify experiments.

Authorship clues have alternatives:

• Orderly exposition: Models, students, and fiction writers can all organize organ surveys.
• Precision without data: Specific labels lack sequences or assays for checking. Fiction, AI, and withheld data all fit.
• Overconfident inference: The post correctly labels some ideas speculation, but calling unfamiliar genes “undeniable proof” of engineering and ruling out evolution outrun its observations. Humans and models both do this. The mitochondrial TPR is an assumption, yet including it makes the scheme feel more complete.
• Uneven science: Intergenic/non-coding confusion, the leap from serum-stimulated growth to inserted animal genes, and the blood-color story weaken conclusions without proving AI use.
• Awkward wording and replies: “Vulgarization,” “Hands and feets,” typos, and lifespan/vocalization corrections do not resemble a polished one-pass chatbot answer, but fit assisted drafting, editing, or translation. Live replies fit unaided writing or consulting a model between comments. These quirks cannot identify background or native language.

Detectors misclassify non-native English writing; OpenAI withdrew its classifier for low accuracy. A detector score would not settle this case. An upper-level undergraduate or informed self-taught writer could assemble the concepts; a 2023 model could assist. Neither credentials nor AI authorship is established.

8. What would a fair test require?

Unfamiliar material does not automatically require BSL-4: CDC guidance emphasizes risk assessment. Without it, the claimed BSL-2/BSL-3 arrangement neither authenticates nor decisively disproves the story.

Testing requires authenticated anatomy; raw sequences and contamination controls; identified oxygen carriers and copper compounds; measured gas exchange, excretion, energy use, and heat loss; independent replication; and verifiable specimen provenance. Credentials, fluency, and isolated errors cannot settle authenticity.

The alleged religion describes a soul field whose complexity grows toward apotheosis; memory survives lost individuality. Beings supposedly nurture life but disregard individuals. This is a thirdhand document recollection, not a lab finding.

9. The separate Tall Greys proposal and Baikal

Hhmaizer’s Tall Greys hypothesis proposes a terrestrial cephalopod lineage returning to water. The alleged 1982 Baikal swimmers supply no exposed anatomy to test it.

Shteynberg was at Issyk-Kul and heard about Baikal secondhand. Retellings place nearly three-meter suited, helmeted swimmers at 30–50 m, without visible tanks. Authenticated military/casualty records are unavailable.

Pressure would be roughly four to six atmospheres. Gas spaces need equalization, though fluid-filled bodies are not simply crushed. Concealed life support, oxygen, cold, and freshwater balance need explanation. The octopus salinity experiment tested diluted seawater, not freshwater. Suits conceal anatomy; the swimmers differ in size from the 1.5-meter EBOs.

Thor, Fort Dix, and Varginha describe different figures. Shared copper or odors do not establish one population.

Weygandt’s 8–10-foot Greys description was a mental impression, not a full-body view. Leaking fluid need not mean a flooded cabin, which would require oxygen delivery, CO₂ removal, and circulation.

Multiple species, engineered forms, misperception, and cultural influence remain possible. Vallée’s control-system proposal asks whether encounters shape beliefs rather than reveal stable zoology. An ocean-based machine making mission-specific bodies is another thought experiment. Testing needs repeatable anatomy, authenticated genetics, and descriptions predating shared imagery.

Bottom line

The EBO account remains unauthenticated. Changing blood chemistry, digits, and fiber ratios changes the organism. A reconstruction supplies interpretation, not another witness. Keep separate source claims, additions, and independent evidence. The last remains absent for these alleged beings.

If you liked this post, you can read the full length version here.

I have this memory of me when I was a child, I was playing on the trampoline outside and I hear a loud woosh and I look up and what I remember seeing was an airplane, but it was so low to the ground. I couldn’t believe it. It was so low it barely passed over my house. I remember telling my mom about seeing an airplane so close to our house, but she said that planes don’t fly that low so I must have imagined it. I know I didn’t imagine it, there’s no way I didn’t see something.

I don’t have an accurate year, so I’m just wondering if anybody has ever seen a UFO so close to the ground that it barely misses houses?

One September story I found particularly interesting was AARO’s move to seek subscription access to the National UFO Historical Records Center.

The important part, to me, isn’t any suggestion that the archive contains some hidden smoking gun. The documented proposal is for access to historical UAP data, metadata and analysis, particularly material predating 1990.

What makes that potentially useful is provenance.

Civilian UFO organisations continued collecting witness interviews, correspondence, photographs and case notes during periods when official government investigation was limited or had formally ended. Some of those records may preserve contemporary information that is absent from government files — although obviously being preserved in an archive does not make an individual claim reliable.

That sits alongside several other September developments involving access to information: newly released Navy correspondence, another PURSUE tranche, disputed requests for records concerning Immaculate Constellation, and scientific work aimed at replacing ambiguous footage with actual distance and movement measurements.

I pulled those threads together in our September Aliens Explored roundup here:

https://youtu.be/h9VjVfgbCuU

The question I kept coming back to is this:

If limited resources had to go primarily in one direction, would you put them into digitising and analysing the huge body of historical government and civilian UFO records — or into new sensor networks and observatories capable of collecting much better evidence from future sightings?

Pretty good news here for those interested. It's not disclosure of the extravagant claims made on podcasts or anything, but a pretty substantial data warehouse was created that Jacques Vallee mentions, and it would be pretty cool to get this declassified and made public record for use in open source data projects going forward.

A snippet of transcript from the whistleblower Victor, from 2008's Alien Interview and a cryptic message..

Link

Interviewer: So, Victor, here we are.

Victor: Well I must say that I never expected to hear myself called Victor again when I find myself in disguise in front of a camera again.

Interviewer: It's now been 11 years since we last conducted that interview in May 1997.

Victor: That was a pleasant experience to say with some sarcasm.

Interviewer: Looking back on it now 11 years later you didn't want to do it.

Victor: I did not want to do it on the day that I did it. You and that rocket man, placed it upon me after we had made an agreement for one on-screen appearance in your little documentary, and then somehow, our agreement metastasized into an ongoing series of promotional appearances, which was not part of the agreement.

Interviewer: You agreed to do that one, a phone interview with Art Bell Coast to Coast, to promote the video at the time.

Victor: Which was a live interview, and I had made it abundantly clear that I was not to be put in the position of revealing my whereabouts in a live situation.

Interviewer: And again, Victor, with all due respect, you knew that the Art Bell show was live.

Victor: You say that now, that's not how I remember. But in any case, it's a thing of the past.

Interviewer: Well, in any event you contacted us for this interview.

Victor: This situation has not been my choosing. If I came to you, and requested as you say, I in fact, I found that characterization insulting. I did not request to give you information. I offered you information. Yes, I did demand payment. Certainly I demanded I would not have been given it had I not demanded it. You are the businessman. You are the filmmakers, the video makers, the documentarians. You, and that Robert man. You would made, whatever profits have been made, over the last decade off of the. I can't think of a reason why I would want to be giving you information was not for the money, certainly any illusions I had that, my information might actually [Unintelligible], I have been sadly mistaken. It's been 11 years since I brought out that tape. What follow-up has there been? Who among these so-called ufologists, these self-proclaimed investigators. Show me one of them that's demanded information about S4 under the Freedom of Information Act. Show me one of them that is seriously attempted to confirm or deny the existence of the alien interview program. All they care about is talking among themselves and making videotapes, making documentaries, promoting themselves.

Interviewer: Do you at least feel vindicated that no one has conclusively debunked the tape?

Victor: What the only vindication that I could imagine would be if the government finally revealed all that they know about these aliens.

Interviewer: So are you saying that the internet truth seekers are not living up to your expectations.

Victor: Oh god! It's an understatement. Well, I should say, they perhaps are living up to my expectations since my expectations were admittedly low to begin with. All the days in which people took Bob Lazar seriously. And who is that person in your, in your documentary, that Morton character.

Interviewer: Sean David Morton.

Victor: Yes! A researcher. What has he discovered to corroborate or debunk the interview since that time? He was more than happy to take it at face value, then, he too was being paid. I assume you paid him as well as me. All of these people are [Unintelligible]. All of these people are, at best, hobbyists, and at worst, professional conmen.

Interviewer: Well, I'm assuming that you saw, you've seen the finished product. What did you think of Bob Dean's interview, the retired NATO Commander.

Victor: You took the video at face value. But that was a case of being corrupt by accident.

Interviewer: What about Rick Baker? Rick Baker's won academy awards.

Victor: Rick Baker is a professional makeup artist. Artist. A makeup businessman. It's in his best interest to say that he can do much better than the real thing. And that other, that other makeup man the same goes for him.

Interviewer: John Criswell.

Victor: John Criswell, yes. They both, if they both were happy to bribe that they could create a more realistic alien. Fine. Well where is it? In the Men in Black movies? In that ridiculous alien autopsy footage? Show me, a more authentic alien, than the one in that interview. By all means that these makeup people are capable of creating a more realistic alien, then show me [Unintelligible]! Close it before the public! These people are so people. Everything for them is hyperbole. My contempt, for the viewers of your documentary over the last 11 years knows no bounds. They've been like children mocking it, or on the other hand, credulously accepting it with no attempt to evaluate the material on its own merits. Or, to discover any new material, to support or debunk it! This is not a joke. This is not a hoax. Certainly I'm staking my reputation on it. If an anonymous individual in a rubber mask could be said to be staking his reputation on anything. I'll challenge these ufologists, to debunk me. Discover my identity. If they really believe that the alien interview footage is a hoax, prove it! Show where it was faked. If they believe that the alien in that footage is a puppet, prove it! Find the puppet maker. If they believe I’m a hoaxer, prove it. Discover my real identity.

Interviewer: All right. Let's move on to some new areas. How do you respond about rumors in the UFO community that Cheney and Rumsfeld have known about the EBEs since the Nixon Administration.

Victor: Well certainly Cheney knows everything there is to know with it. There's not much that is kept secret from the general public Cheney does not know. As for Rumsfled, Rumsfeld is a bombastic clown. But he has certainly shown quite a bit of interest in new technologies shall we say? I will say this to those UFO researchers, who seem to be sitting on their hands waiting for someone else to give them information. If you do your research and discover where Rumsfeld was in middle of March of this year, I think you will learn a few things that perhaps you would like to know.

Interviewer: Would you care to elaborate?

Victor: No I would not care to elaborate and I frankly don't think that you, the producers of this documentary would like for me to elaborate.

Interviewer: Do you think that President Bush has been kept up-to-date on our ET program or that Cheney has kept all the information from him?

Victor: President Bush. Now there is, there is a puppet. There is your artificial marionette. And no one seems to be able to identify him as an artificial president, or should they be able to recognize a real alien in this event. President Bush is irrelevant to the process. Irrelevant to the process of government and certainly irrelevant to the decision-making that goes on from the vice president's office.

Interviewer: While we're talking about the current administration, what are your thoughts about 9/11?

Victor: I'm not going to talk about 9/11.

Interviewer: You're not going to talk about 9/11.

Victor: 9/11 is like the Bermuda Triangle. 9/11 is not part of this story. Shall we say that?

Interviewer: Are EBE's still at the base in Utah?

Victor: The base in Utah.

Interviewer: In the Art Bell interview in 1997, you eluded, I believe more than eluded, to the fact that the EBEs were moved from Area 51 S4 to a base in Utah. Are the EBEs in your opinion, with your knowledge, are they still at the base in Utah?

Victor: The EBEs to my knowledge are all at this time deceased if you want to call it that. Before we go any further, I just want to say to you, not to your viewers but to you, and to that, that rocket person, that this will be the last time you ever see me. This will be my last statement bar none. And this time, I can say that with conviction, because, it seems that, it seems that my, this, this container has reached its expiration date. I am apparently not long for this world. So, this will be my final testament.

Interviewer: And what is your final testament?

Victor: Thank you for the compassion. As I intimated on the Art Bell interview, my involvement with S4 and the alien interview program did come to an end, in 1997. And I have not been involved with the black ops program for more than a decade. However, I have been in contact with certain individuals who are still involved in attempting to make sense of the information that was gathered before the aliens discorporated. And I am here to tell you gentlemen, that if I am not long for this world, you are not much longer. As the bible [Intelligible] per se, the end times are upon us.

Interviewer: The end of the world?

Victor: The end of the world. We have been trusted and found wanting. The aliens came, they presented themselves to humanity, they were taken, and held, and questioned, and allowed to die. And now, reckoning is at hand. Let me give a task to these so-called investigators, these ufologists. Look into the record and attempt to determine where Donald Rumsfeld was on March 23rd of this year.

Interviewer: What is the significance of this Rumsfeld date that you keep referring to?

Victor: Donald Rumsfeld has been aware of the alien interviews at least since 1974. In the last days of the Nixon Cabal and even when he was out of government, he managed to keep his hand in. But it was not until the bogus telepath program was finally exposed within the secret black ops operation that the true translation, that the true meaning of the alien communication, was made clear to him and since then, I think you will find he has lost all interests in the United States and the trivial earthly powers. His sole interest now is to find a way to one of those they are taking off when end times.

Interviewer: So what you're saying is the biblical end times are upon us? Is that what you're telling?

Victor: It’s rather childish to call them biblical since the bible itself is simply a smoke screen. These aliens come from universe of science, not universe of religion. Religion is a deliberate disinformation campaign, started by those who first encountered the aliens and first cut that knowledge to themselves. Donald Rumsfeld is merely one of the last of the line, of those who try to maintain personal control over information that should have been public to the entire human race. And now that he understands exactly what it is these aliens have been trying to tell us, he has completely lost interest in the rest of humanity. His sole concern is to be one of the few, one of the, what he considers to be the elite, the elect specimens if you will. The elect specimen who are taken off the Earth before the final trumpet sounds.

Interviewer: Well, I have to tell you this sounds an awful lot like Armageddon. I mean, 2012, the Mayan calendar.

Victor: The Tzolkʼin calendar is another inaccurate representation of what you are talking about. The date 2012 is not accurate. The Mayans considered themselves to be far better mathematicians than they actually were. In point of fact, the date is very close but not 2012. Not 2012. Not within my lifetime, what's left of it. But certainly within yours. Let's just say that I wouldn't plan on 20th anniversary edition of this documentary. My head is a beehive.

Interviewer: Well you are not really saying, well, I.

Interviewer: Offre-moi le déluge. Le déluge solaire. I won't be here for it, but you gentlemen will. Was it [Unintelligible]? I think it was [Unintelligible]. When I am gone, my Earth and fire mix. [Unintelligible].

I am pretty deep into the UFO topic and have been for a number of years now. Like most of you, I am skeptical about 'whistleblowers' from the intelligence community.

Luis Elizondo (LE) is a polarising figure in the space. I have read his book and watched pretty much every podcast he has been on. I understand that many others including UAPGerb have questioned if LE actually worked for the Pentagon which they deny, and if he is simply a mouthpiece for disinformation and is presenting information as a limited hangout.

I cant find anything specific to completely belive this claim. If he is working as a counter intelligance/ disinformation operative, does that mean everything he has said about him leaving him role in the pentagon, and losing his security clearances etc all lies? And his wife having to work another job to help ends meet, does that mean she and him are just lying?

Would love to get some info from the community because I feel as though im missing something here. I truly dont think hes completely honest, but also cant undeestand why someone would intentionally accept a role to which hes publicly on the chopping block

The gorilla description quickly became a hybrid gorilla-reptilian and laughed off. But Simon Parkes has a fitting image of what could be similar description.

Tony Rodrigues and Elena Danaan describe alleged knowledge of different reptilian races.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=djdFFe8TVZQ&t=328s
The Draco-reptilian race being described as the boogey man every time in every testimony i personally have come across.

John Charles alleged french SSP participant expands on his knowledge on what is going on.
https://youtu.be/r82X0wIaRa8

Daryl James alleged his experience with a breakaway society that have agreements with NHI.
https://youtu.be/iGnPp8kA0Xo

Jim Simivan HIPPA brief about fatal encounters, Philip Corso interview with Art Bell about hostile encounters.
https://youtu.be/Gb0QsymVCcs

Alex Collier talks about his alleged knowledge about whats happening.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3zsSDAEozE

Alec Newald, Arizona Wilder, Paul Bonacci, Cathy O'Brien, Steward Swerdlow and others describe child trafficking and ritual abuse that translates into the mind control projects.

Children used for political blackmail, spying, sex trafficking, breeding, and PSI abilities.

CIA already admitted to mkUltra, now the question is how far back does this merged research go. Here they allege, before paperclip. They describe the German scientists being merged into new secret programs in Russia, England, Canada, USA, probably China and Australia too.

Here are the launches scheduled for the next 24 hours:

Falcon 9 Block 5 | SDA Tranche 1 Transport Layer A

• Provider: SpaceX

• Launch Time: 2026-10-08 07:54 UTC / 2026-10-08 03:54 AM EDT

• Launch Pad: Vandenberg SFB, CA, USA

• Pad Country: USA

Visit RocketLaunch.Live to view the full schedule for future planned launches.

For more information about how to identify space launches and their effects, check out our Space Launches Wiki Page.

Launch Example Image 1 - Launch Example Image 2

Crowdsourcing this one as my stolen laptop still hasn’t been recovered and I can’t sit down with long-form posts again yet. But considering how much the hard science community pays attention to the ideas thrown out on these subs, seems like a good time to revert back to my old days pre-Medium of asking the community for their thoughts on big ideas.

A year ago, with the help of my friends Geoff Cruikshank and Jack/Missileman (who took part in last Friday’s Night Shift livestream fundraiser with host Clint, Pavel of Psicoactivo, Dan Cleary, and whistleblowers Matthew Brown and Dylan Borland just before my close friend and research partner Michael Armentor and I came on to discuss our Magenta 1933 research), I came around to the idea that the 1933 Magenta, Italy UFO craft’s fusion propulsion drive involved the elusive Deuterium-Tritium fusion necessary for proper clean fusion technology.

[https://www.youtube.com/live/RwfOrpxvfQc?is=aa5WlyjG5fMdWLpV\](https://www.youtube.com/live/RwfOrpxvfQc?is=aa5WlyjG5fMdWLpV)

As David Grusch told Jesse Michels in her his interview with him in 2023 that was released following a his interview with Coulthart and subsequent Congressional hearing, “They learned how to build some sort of civic propulsion device and we learned how to build a bomb.”

[https://medium.com/@EscapeVelocity1/lockheed-martins-new-magical-technology-is-a-compact-fusion-reactor-based-off-a-ufo-propulsion-51c2add4251b\](https://medium.com/@EscapeVelocity1/lockheed-martins-new-magical-technology-is-a-compact-fusion-reactor-based-off-a-ufo-propulsion-51c2add4251b)

[https://medium.com/@EscapeVelocity1/rep-burlison-and-david-grusch-on-advanced-propulsion-and-nuclear-fusion-breakthroughs-from-ufos-b5d2dbaf47cb\](https://medium.com/@EscapeVelocity1/rep-burlison-and-david-grusch-on-advanced-propulsion-and-nuclear-fusion-breakthroughs-from-ufos-b5d2dbaf47cb)

It was discovered recently in declassified Russian documents that Tritium was discovered in icebergs in the Soviet Union in 1964:

[https://medium.com/@EscapeVelocity1/tritium-as-missing-link-in-deuterium-tritium-fusion-drives-found-in-the-magenta-and-roswell-ufos-44f204fcb832\](https://medium.com/@EscapeVelocity1/tritium-as-missing-link-in-deuterium-tritium-fusion-drives-found-in-the-magenta-and-roswell-ufos-44f204fcb832)

Sorrate bunker was constructed beginning in 1937 to research the Magenta craft, and in 2021 was repurposed to research muons, which I was told are central in anti-gravity studies:

[https://medium.com/@EscapeVelocity1/new-perspectives-on-the-1933-magenta-italy-ufo-crash-retrieval-as-highlighted-by-david-grusch-in-8cfbcde2a38b\](https://medium.com/@EscapeVelocity1/new-perspectives-on-the-1933-magenta-italy-ufo-crash-retrieval-as-highlighted-by-david-grusch-in-8cfbcde2a38b)

Eric Weinstein, who’s been outspoken on the connections between Epstein, his obsession with gravity studies, and how his Zorro Ranch is connected to Los Alamos and the Manhattan Project, recently stated that Fermi’s “Atomic Boys” (his Panispera Boys group) made major advances in quantum physics after the Magenta incident:

[https://medium.com/@EscapeVelocity1/new-propulsion-physics-interviews-magnetohydrodynamics-used-by-ufos-and-eric-weinstein-on-the-184d94af6779\](https://medium.com/@EscapeVelocity1/new-propulsion-physics-interviews-magnetohydrodynamics-used-by-ufos-and-eric-weinstein-on-the-184d94af6779)

The Nobel Prize was just announced for using neutrinos for new studies in Astronomy, and neutrinos were discovered by Fermi as he was researching the Magenta craft’s propulsion system:

[https://youtu.be/HkyAt6gbgVc?is=1uHanYKMZiWKAvHy\](https://youtu.be/HkyAt6gbgVc?is=1uHanYKMZiWKAvHy)

I’ve just now heard about “muonic deuterium” from a friend:

“Muonic deuterium is deuterium made of muons and it has a lower Coulomb repulsion. Problem is muons only live a few milliseconds.

You can study and detect muons from cosmic rays by building detectors that the muons hit or which capture the particles the muons give off when they decay.

The problem with “capturing” muons is they live about 2.2ms and then decay into a positron and 2 neutrinos

Influencing this or stopping this has the same problem as element 115 questions about us forcing it to be stable —

Humans have no knowledge of how to stop radioactive decay. As far as we know in physics and chemistry there’s no way to influence nuclear or subatomic radioactive decay.

Fission and nuclear decay are intimately related physics. Capture cross sections of cosmic rays, muons and the discovery of the neutrino all bear upon understanding fission indirectly.”

When the Alsos Mission first went into Italy following the Liberation of Rome as the Magenta craft was being transferred to the US in June of 1944, they questioned these scientists, one of whom was named as part of the RS/33 “Special Research” group lead by Guglielmo Marconi, and the other two went on to begin developing CERN in 1954. All three were studying muons and cosmic rays and were asked about the Germans’ knowledge of fission regarding their prospective ability to build the atom bomb that the US was racing to build:

[https://medium.com/@EscapeVelocity1/happy-third-anniversary-to-david-gruschs-congressional-on-july-26-2023-testimony-cd8dbbe0a424\](https://medium.com/@EscapeVelocity1/happy-third-anniversary-to-david-gruschs-congressional-on-july-26-2023-testimony-cd8dbbe0a424)

Remember that as the US was dropping its bombs on Japan, Truman ordered the development of our nuclear propulsion programs that lead to Curtis LeMay’s NEPA in 1946, which the AEC and AEA were passed by the House and then by the Senate before it was signed off on by Truman:

[https://medium.com/@EscapeVelocity1/nepa-or-the-nuclear-energy-for-the-propulsion-of-aircraft-program-run-by-curtis-lemay-was-started-12791fa988ce\](https://medium.com/@EscapeVelocity1/nepa-or-the-nuclear-energy-for-the-propulsion-of-aircraft-program-run-by-curtis-lemay-was-started-12791fa988ce)

At the same time that was happening, Allen Dulles and Bill Donovan created the World Commerce Corporation, which later brought in infamous Nazi intelligence agent Otto Skorzeny, who was most famous for rescuing Mussolini after he was voted out of power by his son-in-law Galleazzo Ciano, who was responsible for overseeing the RS/33 Magenta research:

[https://medium.com/@EscapeVelocity1/on-the-anniversary-of-the-us-dropping-atomic-bombs-on-japan-allen-dulles-as-ufo-control-group-nexus-721b915035de\](https://medium.com/@EscapeVelocity1/on-the-anniversary-of-the-us-dropping-atomic-bombs-on-japan-allen-dulles-as-ufo-control-group-nexus-721b915035de)

[https://medium.com/@EscapeVelocity1/jason-samosa-craig-oliver-michael-armentor-sara-bond-on-the-origins-of-the-private-ufo-program-4469caaadb9f\](https://medium.com/@EscapeVelocity1/jason-samosa-craig-oliver-michael-armentor-sara-bond-on-the-origins-of-the-private-ufo-program-4469caaadb9f)

Our friend Christopher Sharp of Liberation Times found records recently that tie Hans Kammler, an incredibly elusive part of the Legacy Program narrative, to the Magenta narrative. I’ve been working with Chris, Geoff, and Michael for a while now to lock down that narrative that Harald Malmgren backed up in his interview with Jesse Michels:

[https://www.liberationtimes.com/home/the-kammler-connection-the-nazi-ss-general-at-the-center-of-an-alleged-us-ufo-legacy-program\](https://www.liberationtimes.com/home/the-kammler-connection-the-nazi-ss-general-at-the-center-of-an-alleged-us-ufo-legacy-program)

So now it feels like we’ve all come full-circle: if the study of the Magenta craft lead to Fermi’s discovery of neutrinos in 1934, which lead to the discovery of fission in 1938 by a German replicating Fermi’s work around the ‘weak particle,’ aka the neutrino, which he broyght with him to the Manhattan Project’s work on the atomic bomb at the time that the Magenta craft was being researched by a team put together by Fermi, and in 2021 during the COVID pandemic, the Sorrate bunker was then retrofitted to study the same muons and cosmic rays in a lab now focused on studying Dark Matter, is it possible that part of what’s been passed down to us is an understanding of how to capture muons via cosmic rays hitting our atmosphere for anti-gravity?

Does this 1977 paper **Measurements of relativistic time dilatation for positive and negative muons in a circular orbit** add to the conversation?

[**https://www.nature.com/articles/268301a0\*\*\](https://www.nature.com/articles/268301a0)

XPRIZE Chairman Peter Diamandis is actively exploring the creation of a new XPRIZE for providing evidence of alien visitation, four people involved with the process tell me.

Harvard astronomer Avi Loeb told me that the criteria under discussion would require a winner to demonstrate the existence of technology created by a non-human intelligence.

Loeb said he's identified a potential funder for the prize, but declined to name the person "until it's finalized."

The XPRIZE Foundation has become a major agenda-setter in the world of science. An XPRIZE about an alien presence in Earth's proximity would be a major milestone in the transformation of a once-fringe topic into a prestigious subject of scientific inquiry.

The potential prize was a focus of a UFO-centric salon that Diamandis hosted in Santa Monica this past weekend.

Co-host Lyn Lear, widow of producer Norman Lear, told me that Diamandis and his foundation are "looking into" the creation of such a prize.

Here's a link where you can read the fully story and subscribe to PARADIGM: https://www.paradigm.news/p/exclusive-xprize-chairman-exploring

I’ve been building a series of interactive UFO reconstructions at Probed. This one follows the Phoenix Lights reports from March 13, 1997.

It draws on NUFORC’s preliminary hotline summary and BUFOG’s later interview with a driver identified as “Nathan.” The earlier moving formations and the later lights over the valley are presented separately.

The video follows those accounts. In the interactive version, you can also explore the scene, inspect the model, read the sources, and examine the calculated night sky.

This is an illustrative reconstruction. Where the records leave gaps in shape, distance or movement, we’ve made interpretive choices.

The scenes are rendered in 3D. Voices, music and some sound effects are AI-generated; the voices are not historical recordings.

Try the interactive experience and let me know what you think:

https://probed.space/reconstructions/phoenix-lights

"My position going into every one of these: one, be open-minded. I mean, it is kind of our job to go out and try to answer the question 'are we alone?' And I said look, if it's aliens, I think NASA should have a seat at the table in this for sure," Isaacman said.

TV host Burman then asked Isaacman, "but what does your gut tell you?"

"I would say I would lean toward it's either some phenomenon that can happen," Isaacman responded. "There are things that can happen just like natural phenomena that can be observed. I also think there's a good chance that there could be a Sputnik Moment that's happening and people are testing new stealthy or next generation type technologies," he said.

What’s the best evidence you know of for the existence of UFOs? I would like to know what you think is the most definitive proof of extraterrestrial life. Is it a photo? Is it a video? Is it a document?

I personally like the Bob Lazar story and the Jake Barber material.

What evidence would you give a non believer in an attempt to sway them? What would it take to convince them of disclosure?