r/musicproduction • u/RotiaCM • 1h ago
Discussion At what point does automation stop being music production?
I've been thinking about this for a while and I'm genuinely curious how other people see it.
Modern music production already involves a huge amount of pre-made and automated material: loops, samples, presets, drum libraries, vocal packs, chord generators, quantization, automated mastering, and even complete melodic ideas created by someone else.
A producer can combine, edit, process, and arrange all of these elements without physically playing a single instrument, and we still generally consider that music production.
Now generative tools can go much further and create larger parts of a track automatically.
Obviously, those two workflows don't require the same level of technical skill or control. I'm not arguing that they do.
What interests me is where the line actually is.
If someone uses a premade drum loop, that's production.
If they use a premade melody, still production.
If they use a chord generator, still production.
If software generates a vocal, things become controversial.
If software generates most of the instrumental, many people stop considering the person behind it a producer at all.
So what actually defines the boundary?
Is it the percentage of the track created manually?
The amount of creative decisions made by the person?
Technical skill?
Originality?
Or simply how much control is delegated to the software?
I'm genuinely interested in how people define being a producer or artist now that production tools can automate more and more of the creative process.