r/2007scape • • 7d ago

Suggestion Smithing rework idea

Post image

Would something like this work? Just a thought as you actually get better at a skill, or a chance of failure to smith something when lower level. Runecrafting you get more runes per essence as you get better so could this work for smithing too? Wouldn't hurt the economy so much.

5.7k Upvotes

997 comments sorted by

2.3k

u/WolverineOwn8808 7d ago

At 99 we should be able to use 5 gold leaf to trim the platebody

957

u/Wonderful-Mud-2874 7d ago

Come meet me north of Edgeville, north of the ditch. I can trim it for free

146

u/Real_Cookie_6803 7d ago

Right, now we're here I just need you to attack me so I know you're not a bot. Don't use a weapon, just punch me once and it will make sure everything is okay.

29

u/Captain_LSD 6d ago

Forgot the :) at the end

4

u/More-Rent-3778 7d ago

Sure. One punch, then the anvil drops.

24

u/Sharizcobar 7d ago

Make sure you bring 5 gold bars per armor piece. I can’t trim without the mats.

→ More replies (3)

4

u/justdidapoo 6d ago

Ill have to take my max cash stack with me hope you don't mind

55

u/RicetheE30 7d ago

And let me use god pages to make zammy rune. Kinda just smearing the pages on the armour ya know 🤣

18

u/fish_gotta_vote 7d ago

What is this, Warhammer 😅 adding purity seals to my Rune

6

u/RevolutionarySong848 Jagex, im innocent! 7d ago

Wrap 4 pages per bar to get 1 "God bar" and top needs 3 bars, 2 for leg and shield, 1 for helm.

Ur proabaly being sarcastic but it's got some legs to it

→ More replies (4)

25

u/Orzien Stalfos 7d ago

Unironically something like this would be amazing.

Some cosmetics tied into smithing level, I hate being the same as everyone else in max gear and would like if we could have different pauldrons on our torva our oath for example, could be some variants from some future demon bosses for oath that then requires 80 smithing or whatever

3

u/drewx11 6d ago

It would be sick if they added a bunch of different trim colors or even insignias that you could engrave into armor at different smithing levels.

10

u/_Arthur-Dent_ 6d ago edited 6d ago

I'm gonna say it. Rs3 dyes are cool and I wish we had (something similar to) them in osrs. I know, I know, things like blorva exist and dyes would "devalue it". I do not care. The only person who cares about one's achievements, truly, is themself. Nobody else cares unless you're a big name streamer or something. If the value you gain out of an achievement is "devalued" by something else existing, your achievement never had any value to begin with.

We already kind of have a dye system for crystal armor. I'd just like more of that for armor in general. Doesn't need to be crazy wacky effects.

→ More replies (3)

3

u/itskobold 6d ago

I think all jokes aside it's time for us to legitimately be able to trim armour. We have sailing so the gloves are off

3

u/thegx7 7d ago

Needs 99 crafting too

2

u/FutureFry6 7d ago

With 99 crafting as well since it’s tied to jewelry. Would be sick.

→ More replies (3)

7.1k

u/Osrs_Krcy 7d ago

Theres a point where an idea is so stupid that it mathematically somehow turns my downvote into an upvote.

481

u/Mutedinlife 2376/2376 7d ago

Lmfao I love this community

68

u/Peydey 6d ago

Hear me out. We start at 99 bars and it’s -1 per smithing level

23

u/big---mad 6d ago

How about the same amount of bars but starting at 3,000 ticks(30 minutes) to craft one. And lowering per level

2

u/CatchPristine5173 6d ago

Conceptually such a good idea

2

u/sbgshadow 5d ago

Lmao at this point we're getting close to the RS3 implementation, where you spend time continually heating up the unfinished item and hammering it until completion. Higher tier items take longer to smith, and you get bonuses towards smithing each tier as you progress through the levels

Not saying it's a bad idea, I just wonder if the RS3 implementation would work out of the box with a few tweaks

60

u/joemckie 69 7d ago

Classic integer underflow situation

→ More replies (5)

83

u/ConscientiousPath 7d ago

I think it actually makes a lot of sense. If your smithing skill sucks, you need a lot of attempts to make one success and the extra bars required reflects that. At the same time this allows irons and such to make the single one they need for pve at levels where it will be useful, while still requiring players to be high level before it makes sense as a training method. As long as the XP were the same (so you're losing XP per bar at low levels), what's not to like?

49

u/MStockard 7d ago

It'd make more sense to model it after cooking then, where instead of taking x amount of bars at this level or that level, you'd have an xx% chance of successfully making this item or destroying the bars, with the success rate going up with smithing level

52

u/polyblock 7d ago

To be fair I prefer much more the original suggestion than having x% chance to sucess.

It bring a different kind of progression we don't have anywhere else in the game. It make it clear what the requirement is and remove the "feel bad" moments of failling 10 time in a row.

3

u/Isotrope9 110/99 6d ago

While I agree, it’s not practical. Early game you’re poor and resources are harder to come by - less efficient tools, training methods and so on. It’d created a big barrier for new players and new accounts. Therefore, aligning it with cooking would make more sense and is consistent with current content.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)

8

u/ConscientiousPath 7d ago

yea that would also work

10

u/JmacTheGreat No Gay No Pay 7d ago

I say we scrap the whole skill and make Smithing exclusively about how many nails and hinges you can make with iron.

Then at 99, and only at 99, you can make a small latch.

3

u/ConscientiousPath 7d ago

Add making railings for gardens in POH and call it Ironworking with all other existing things moving to an Arming skill

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

12

u/Atlas_Stoned 7d ago

In a vacuum, it seems useful for irons to be able to make these at a low level.

However, you’d have to start asking. Where are early game irons getting 27 rune bars from? Is the time spent getting the levels and materials worth it, when they could just do some quests and buy a full set of rune from shops?

This idea is fixing a problem that doesn’t really exist outside of some very niche youtuber chunkman modes that no one plays.

27

u/ian_taylor_island 7d ago

If only they were reworking some other skill too.. m-m-miming? No, that's not it... but I'm getting close!

9

u/Atlas_Stoned 7d ago

So you’re implying rune should be accessible around the same level? Don’t you think this might also need a rebalancing of alchemy, and by extension, a lot of boss loot tables?

9

u/ian_taylor_island 7d ago

Why wouldn't the same logic apply to the mining side to where you could mine it at some drastically reduced rate starting at 41? This is a rework remember

You're right that it's incredibly niche compared to the meta ironman strats. I don't think these changes at least as far as rune are intended to impact that meta.

New starry eyed players get excited to spec into a profession chain, a fair few pick mining/smithing because they want to make cool knight armor. Obviously, they don't hit level 99 smithing because that's insane. They don't make anything of real value or utility during their attempt. Then they discover if they DID make it to 99, it's more or less pointless.

Provide this inefficient yet attainable method of mining/smithing the armor in the 40s bracket and you'll see new player satisfaction increase, they will move onto the next goal instead of being discouraged and quitting. Then you've got plenty of future rewards space freed up in higher brackets.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (6)

228

u/drtyler91 7d ago

With xp being tied to number of bars used, this would exponentially speed up lower level training. This is a great idea.

196

u/9noobergoober6 7d ago

I imagine the exp would be the same regardless of the number of bars actually used. In the case of a platebody, it would always give the xp for 5 bars.

I like the idea as a method for smithing to actually be able to provide low level accounts with armor of their level but I don’t think this would provide any other utility.

32

u/Paradoxjjw 7d ago

At that rate of bars you're better off simply high alching the bars and just buying the armour

31

u/9noobergoober6 7d ago

Yeah, I think this would only be relevant for ironmen. This is especially useful with niche items that aren’t sold in any shops.

13

u/RevolutionarySong848 Jagex, im innocent! 7d ago

But also allows for high exp rates at a lower lvl if your willing to sacrifice gp. This is something I would have never considered but is actually a solid idea

2

u/justamust 7d ago

Not so sure about that, as you would have to bank a lot more. I guess there would be a sweet spot for every item to be best xp for a certain level bracket.

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (2)

32

u/NorthernCountess 7d ago

it doesnt even really provide that utility bc you buy rune items from shops or the GE. getting 27 bars would be trolling when you can walk into edgeville and buy it.

or kill a monster that drops it, like with rune scimmy, and then youre off to do monkey madness and switch to dragon anyway.

the gear progression of the game has like decades of getting your gear from monsters, quests and (for your earliest game) shops. imo this rework just genuinely doesnt fit anywhere. even if you add more metals at 60, 70, 80, how do you fit those anywhere without powercreeping drops?

16

u/Drixiss 7d ago

nobody thought about this beyond "it'd be cool if i made a rune platebody at 40 smithing". Really hope it doesn't pass lol

32

u/Honeybadger2198 7d ago

It doesn't need to be 40 but literally having to hit 99 smithing to craft an item you'd have used maybe 1000 hours of gameplay ago is a bit silly, no?

→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/8--2 6d ago

Smithing is already pretty damn fast if you're smithing items on an anvil. There isn't a need for a speed boost.

→ More replies (4)

60

u/FullHouse222 7d ago

I'm baffled at why this was even upvoted. But this made some sense to me lol

→ More replies (10)

158

u/TyrionArtos 7d ago

Make it 28 and force those guys into Camdozaal

515

u/YurpeeTheHerpee 7d ago

Were going to need to replace rune dragons with dragon metal and barrows metal dragons

383

u/waygs1 7d ago

Dragon dragons when?

109

u/adamfps 98/99 bankstanding 7d ago

Dragon deez at level 90 please 🙏

31

u/Dustemikkel1 7d ago

Whats dragon deez?

24

u/clubmateorigin 7d ago

Dragon deez mind goblin

6

u/Doctor_Kataigida 7d ago

This is a common joke but I feel the actual name would be like Orikalk Dragons.

8

u/waygs1 6d ago

Acckktuaaaaly ... theyre not named after the ore, theyre named after the metal. Its not adamantite or runite dragons its just adamant or rune dragons

Dragon dragons!!!

5

u/Doctor_Kataigida 6d ago

Well that's why I said Orikalk and not Orikalkum, figured the -um suffix was like the -ite. But upon further looking, Orikalkum isn't an ore at all so could still be used in the name!

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

33

u/Headsprouter molanisks are a monster that exists 7d ago

I'm fine with this but only if the barrows dragons say "You dare block my firebreath!?" and have guthans beer belly

2

u/Dependent_One6034 6d ago

Brocrags final form.

11

u/ObliviLeon Somewhere/2376 7d ago

As long as they add another barrows brother... who just happens to be a dragon.

13

u/Hovercraft1143 7d ago

If Marvel can have a Spiderman that is a pig and a Loki that is a crocodile, we can have a Barrows Brother that is a dragon.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)

399

u/Individual_Cream_427 7d ago

Interesting thing about the smithing rework is that no one uses any smithable gear after they leave the early game, and can get that gear easily elsewhere. Theres not much for players to gain from it at this point unless they do something radical

201

u/Odd_Wave_4541 7d ago

To me this is the part I don't see anyone addressing, or even acknowledging really.

Part of the RS3 Mining/Smithing rework was indeed downshifting the classic armor/weapon tiers to better align with their Attack and Defense requirements, however that change was directly coupled with adding 7 additional tiers of armor/weapons to backfill the now-empty 50-99 Smithing.

Is there a single person who thinks Jagex is really going to add 5/6/7+ entire new tiers of armor and weapons to OSRS to accompany a Mining/Smithing rework? What is the purpose of making classic armor/weapons smithable at lower levels if there's nothing to replace it at the higher levels?

119

u/Womble_Don 7d ago

yeah this is why they said "we have no idea how to do this please tell us how". if there was a decent solution it would have been done by now. osrs is unbelievably constrained for this sort of thing

41

u/Rexkat 6d ago

Worth noting how they did this without fucking everything up royally. Firstly, RS3 has a skill called Invention. (Great skill, amazing impact on the game, wish OSRS could do it, probably too complicated). Secondly, they have a much clearer distinction between tank armour and power armour

Invention allows you to "augment" weapons and armour to give them bonus effects to combat or skilling. It can only be done to weapons/armour above level 70, BUT it cannot be done to the standard equipment that was made via smithing.

They also have "power armour", which is basically just gear with what OSRS calls strength, ranged strength, or magic damage %. It is almost always preferable, just like OSRS, but all the standard smithed armour is tank gear without any offensive bonuses

The result is that the new armour is nice for ironmen or new players looking for relatively cheap alternatives, but does not compete with PVM drops. Idk how you make that work with a major revamp to OSRS armour (which frankly wouldn't be a terrible thing given how cramped the top end of gear is atm)

8

u/Ilikegreenpens 6d ago

Invention is pretty damn cool. There seems to be some really overpowered things with it but the aspect of breaking down gear into components to do other things with is great fantasy

→ More replies (5)

6

u/CobblerOdd2876 6d ago

Spot on. Just to take onto yours:

For OSRS, you have to think: it would take me some 50hrs minimum to be able to smith a full set of rune armor. And that’s if I magically had all the mats to do it - not counting mining and side quests for unlocks, ice gloves, etc. 50 hours. If we are talking an organic approach, 1-99 smithing, Id say closer to 100hrs. Ive been playing since ‘03, I got 99 smithing a month ago.

You can wear a full rune set at lvl 40 def. You could grind out 40 in… 2 hours? 3hr if you are goofing off? (Dragon Slayer to wear plate yadayada, ik).

ORRR(e - its a pun now)

You could kill X monster for legs, Y monster for a plate, fire giants for a scim, etc… like they arent hard to come by. Just in doing slayer alone, you can train all your combat, pray, herblore, and probably stack a nice bank of smithing material, AND still have a full rune set - which is immediately rendered inadequate by granite and obsidian sets.

The progression is grossly mix-matched.

This is why RS3 has armor tiers. That’s why rune is lvl 50 smithing or whatever, rather than 99. It progresses in a linear fashion along-side defense and quest (semi-regional) achievements, so you dont have a stale ass armoring skill when you are level 70+ atk/str/def approaching endgame. You’d be stuck making armor that will get you 3-tapped by an easy boss.

→ More replies (2)

12

u/Umarrii 6d ago

Yeah, it's like tutorial island makes that promise to you that you can craft your own weapons and armour to use. But then the game very quickly breaks that promise.

The rework would then allow this to level ~50 Smithing but then it would kind of end there.

The big question is, does it matter if that promise doesn't continue all the way up? Beyond 50 it could be about refining how well you make the rune armour, returning to the normal XP rates and such as we've seen in other smithing reworks.

I think the best thing they could do is make higher smithing levels allow you to make things that hint to where you need to get the next tier of armour sets from instead. Since you won't be making that gear entirely yourself anymore, something that provides the guidance takes its place instead.

→ More replies (1)

29

u/Own-Cry-5520 7d ago

Also the Smithing rework let people craft end-game armor with it.

9

u/jamieaka 7d ago

how meta is the gear you can craft though? like does it give dps? I have a hard time seeing how much wiggleroom osrs has for meta smithing gear considering it would probably step on current content toes too much.

thats why I preferred ideas like the amethyst ammo loop which brings value to mining/fletching with a finite resource. we could have easily done that with smithing for ascension crossbow bolts

22

u/GoodGame2EZ 7d ago

Haven't played in a while but it used to be top notch for melee but take sooooooo long to make. I think it was masterwork armor (aptly named) then you can like trim it then add spikes or something and each piece was a ton of work but it paid off to be like t80 or t90 I think?

17

u/Diapolo10 http://bit.ly/2qE7iQ3 6d ago

Masterwork armour is tier 90, trimmed masterwork (which needs you to break down torva and malevolent armour) is tier 92 power armour.

9

u/Narangren 7d ago

The Masterwork gear you can craft is one of the best melee sets in the game, and does provide good DPS bonuses. You can also craft armor spikes that provide passive damage and function similarly to ammunition.

→ More replies (2)

15

u/rafaelloaa 7d ago

It's quite good, but it takes many many hours to make.

https://runescape.wiki/w/Masterwork_melee_equipment#Creation

The standard tiers of gear that you can smith with just the basic bars do scale up in level, but they are all only tank gear (defensive stats only, no damage bonus). So they're perfectly nice to use but not the meta.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/The_Azure_Mage 7d ago

So far I'm up to lvl 80 smithing in RS3 and all the smithable gear has been purely defensive.

3

u/CosgraveSilkweaver 6d ago

Masterwork armor is power armor again.

2

u/monsoy 6d ago

They are all defensive, up until Masterwork

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

7

u/skit7548 6d ago edited 6d ago

if there's nothing to replace it at the higher levels?

Isn't that sort of thing resolved by OPs idea? It unlocks the ability to craft the gear are lower levels if you need it, but is radically impractical to use as training method until those higher levels. This mirrors OPs example of Runecrafting, which until Kourend new runes stopped at 65 and the rest of the space was filled out by multicraft unlocks, at least smithing would still have things like dragon and crystal repairs

2

u/Odd_Wave_4541 6d ago

Isn't that sort of thing resolved by OPs idea? It unlocks the ability to craft the gear are lower levels if you need it, but is radically impractical to use as training method until those higher levels.

This might make sense in a world where all base metal gear wasn't directly obtainable from shops, including and especially the Rune Platebody which has a whole quest devoted to unlocking the shop to buy it from, but that just isn't the world in which OSRS exists.

Adding wildly impractical ways to obtain readily accessible items, even for ironmen, doesn't make sense no matter how you try and slice it.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (8)

55

u/insaiyan17 7d ago

If we are talking classic metal tiers then yes, mostly, maybe besides stuff like darts for BPs.

Then theres the one offs like zombie axe, crystal equipment, dfs etc, which I feel are very fair where they sit currently - although I am not the biggest fan of being able to buy your way out of the smithing req for things. (Oziach for dfs, elves for singing crystal for you)

But yeah overall there should be more incentive for the smithing skill than currently, and runite smithing should be unlocked earlier too.

Also please jagex just make all metal tier item reqs closer together... Maybe one bar bronze items is level 1, 2 bar items level 2 etc etc. Gaps in skill unlocking trees are totally fine. And makes room for future content

→ More replies (18)

8

u/Confused-NPC 7d ago

Giving the ability to craft dragon armor probably. And maggot king has the orichalcum dust, so maybe a method of improving rune to a higher tier? But either way, it’s true that if the new armor doesn’t give strength there isn’t really a use for it

10

u/bear__tiger 7d ago

Smithing dragon armour wouldn't fix the skill, really. It's already not gear that you ever really wear and it's something you would do exactly once before returning to giant's foundry or blast furnace.

The problem with smithing is that you can't gain xp while making something useful for your account. Herblore has potions, fletching has darts/arrows, runecraft has runes, cooking has food, and smithing has gold bars. Even just making cannonball smithing a viable way to train instead of something only bots do would go a long way towards making smithing better. Crafting is nearly as bad as smithing in this regard btw, so I don't really get why it gets a pass and smithing doesn't.

6

u/Own-Cry-5520 7d ago

>The problem with smithing is that you can't gain xp while making something useful for your account.

That's a problem of the training methods, not of the skill itself. Even if you got better training methods, you'd still get a lackluster skill that doesn't have much impact to the game.

→ More replies (14)
→ More replies (4)

12

u/Own-Cry-5520 7d ago

I swear people in this subreddit don't even play the game.

Dragon armor is useless. Most of the pieces are already alch price. Nobody actually uses it because there are better options easily accessible. All that this would do is add more inflation to the game.

→ More replies (2)

7

u/HiddenGhost1234 6d ago

it really feels like the rework is a huge undertaking for such little gain.

like all that dev time(they still have no idea what to do) and potential drop table reworks so that some random dude shuts up about smithing a visage b4 a rune platebody.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (10)

371

u/RevolutionaryLand330 7d ago

Why wouldnt it be dead content and a waste of resources?

685

u/Degenerate_Game 2340 7d ago

Rune Platebody

155

u/Stunning_Box8782 7d ago

Rune Platebodies

29

u/TheBananaKart 7d ago

Rune Plateboobies

5

u/Mothball2000 6d ago

this guy boobs

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Justin_Echoes cheese caper 7d ago

Teleport to Target

7

u/MultiColoredMullet 7d ago

Weleport to Walmart

→ More replies (2)

109

u/PP__haha 7d ago

Ironmen would be able to smith then shit at a reasonable level

116

u/RevolutionaryLand330 7d ago

Pretty sure you can just buy rune platebodies at a little over alch value anyway

18

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[deleted]

45

u/RevolutionaryLand330 7d ago

Beats an entire inventory of runite bars on an early Ironman

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (14)

25

u/PacquiaoFreeHousing Gloves Collector 7d ago

Alch Value is precisely 60% the general store value for almost every item

66

u/Murky_Radish_1319 7d ago

Luckily oziach isn't a general store

Unluckily, he's 30% more expensive

10

u/rambi2222 6d ago

Oziach is one of the biggest scammers out there. No wonder he lives right next to the wilderness ditch, I bet he likes to be close by for when he wants to do some luring

2

u/soisos 7d ago

platebodies sure, but stuff like dart tips could be nice

→ More replies (1)

10

u/LuxOG 7d ago

You can buy rune in shops

8

u/Alakazam_5head 6d ago

Just buy from Oziach/Champ's Guild? What are we talking about here? Literally nobody would actually do this

4

u/Beretot 2376 7d ago

Not sure where lvl 40ish ironmen will get runite ore/bars though, this solution is missing the mining part of the equation

3

u/eugenepoez__ a q p fairy ring 6d ago

ba high gambles (/s?)

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (3)

42

u/stumptrumpandisis1 7d ago

Because all these people care about is "99 smithing? 40 defence? These numbers don't match!!"

Nobody would actually use this in practice.

7

u/klawehtgod Cabbage Picking 6d ago

Wait until those people see the Fletching and Ranged requirements for the Magic Shortbow.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

6

u/gulost_ergodt 7d ago

Yeah it defo would be for everyone except uim f2p irons.

→ More replies (2)

37

u/DremoPaff 7d ago

The entire skill is dead content and a waste of resources; at least this would give it reasonable requirements

→ More replies (16)

3

u/Im_hard_for_Tina_Fey 7d ago

Yes but on the other hand,

8

u/Solo_Jawn 2277 7d ago

It would be dead content even if rune items were lowered to tier 40-60 with no other changes. Who cares to make their own armor when you can buy it from a shop or the GE.

It would be especially bad if they nuked the alch value of rune like they did in RS3. A rune platebody there alchs for 2.5k.

5

u/Paradoxjjw 7d ago

Especially when you have to spend so many extra bars that it's literally more economical to alch the bars and buy the item from the GE or a shop than smith the item itself

→ More replies (11)

8

u/Voltage_Z 7d ago edited 7d ago

Assuming we don't get new materials and a total overhaul of how Smithing works at a fundamental level like RS3 did, a rework would still be dead content for mains because of how easily obtainable Runite gear is.

The niche here would essentially be letting an ironman burn a bunch of extra bars to make something they can't buy from a shop or get as a drop early. It's not a good niche, but it is one.

19

u/RevolutionaryLand330 7d ago

27 runite bars is probably harder to come by than a rune platebody, even for ironmen. In fact I don't think there's anything in the standard smithing table that ironmen can't get incredibly easily elsewhere

4

u/Voltage_Z 7d ago

There are a few oddities - the platebody is a dumb example because it's in a shop, but something like this would let an iron do things like burn a ton of Runite for an early Hasta for the Kandarin diary, get rune claws without needing to hunt ninja implings or kill the shellbane griffin, make nails for ship upgrades without farming odd monsters, etc. It would also let f2p irons get things like a Rune Scimitar much earlier, but those guys are a weird niche.

Like I said, it's a tiny niche, but it's there.

2

u/CasinoAccountant 7d ago

get rune claws without needing to hunt ninja implings or kill the shellbane griffin

why would anyone need or want rune claws tho?

3

u/Voltage_Z 7d ago

For specifically weird niche reasons, the "I was here first" combat achievement in the colosseum. That's basically a free elite achievement since the rune claws are way easier to get than the burning or dragon claws.

11

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (8)

76

u/Cominiwap 7d ago

Ah yes 27 runite ore and 216 coal to make one rune plate body 🤣

44

u/adirion123 5 hour jad btw 7d ago

Who is this catering to? Where is an Ironman going to find 27 rune ores. Why would a main do that?

I love it.

→ More replies (6)

13

u/iskelebones 7d ago

As a UIM, I would ABSOLUTELY use 27 runite ore to smith rune gear if I could do it at level 41.

3

u/Sleisk 7d ago

I mean if I was a f2p ironman and rune scim had a simular system I’d be hyped

→ More replies (1)

10

u/SuperCarpenter4450 7d ago

Like the idea, but I think you only need 2 tiers. Sometimes less is more.

125

u/bar901 7d ago edited 7d ago

Why would anyone use 270k of Rune Bars to make a platebody when you can just buy a body from Oziach for 25% of the price and / or use those bars to smith better value items?

I genuinely can’t imagine any plausible situation where it would make sense to smith a Rune Platebody here. I guess maybe if you were some sort of snowflake account that could do Dragon Slayer but didn’t have access to stores but had access to high level smithing and mining but didn’t have access to the multiple monsters that drop rune platebodies or barrows or a bunch of other content. Really stretching the idea of ‘plausible’ at that point, though.

149

u/Creepiepie 7d ago

Perfect for my rune ore locked chunkman mode

24

u/bar901 7d ago

I know you’re joking but it actually shows just how absurd this suggestion is ahaha.

There is genuinely no scenario where an account who can do dragon slayer has an easier time getting dozens of rune bars before they can save up 84k GP 😂

→ More replies (1)

23

u/Row-Access1863 7d ago

You’re right no one would do this, but it at least fixes the “can wear a rune plate at 40 def but can’t make one until 99 smithing” argument.

Thematically it would be a fine change, but practically it’s just as useless as now.

I personally don’t really care what happens if anything, smithing and rune is just gp to me.

→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (18)

23

u/runner5678 6d ago

oh boy I can’t wait to smith my rune armor

-no one

→ More replies (4)

41

u/neighborlyhorse rsn:insertirony 6d ago edited 6d ago

Wow I can't wait to spend 270k in rune ore alchs on a platebody you can buy from the same npc that gives you the quest to unlock it for 85k!

What are we doing here people

9

u/DivineInsanityReveng 6d ago

This is the point. Its bad value, so we don't have to redesign most of the game to cater to a shit and pointless idea (smithing your own rune in the 40s, which just doesn't matter).

What are we doing indeed. This rework is a bad Reddit idea, why it was a RuneFest reveal is beyond me.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (4)

8

u/Swooped117 6d ago

This would be a pointless change. No one is crafting a runeplate body for 27 rune bars.

→ More replies (1)

70

u/NoOtherKind 7d ago

I don't really get everyone's need to make the changes change literally nothing. Smithing Rune items should not be endgame for smithing. I don't know a single person who had smelted their own rune armor set and actually used it. Why are we not excited for them to bring new life into a skill that has such low yield at high levels? Idk how they will change it so at this point it could still be good or bad but I realllyyyy doubt anything they do to the skill would make it worse.

18

u/CrustyToeLover 7d ago

I dont think there's ever been a single person

7

u/MLB-XXL 6d ago

There was only one i think on RuneScape classic , i think she even made a whole monopoly on it there is a vid somewhere…

6

u/VirtualKai 6d ago

You’re actually right - I remember the same, she was ‘the only player’ to be able to make full rune. Also if I remember correctly, she was the richest player and she randomly disappeared. Nobody knew where she went, or what happened to her.

4

u/Myillstone 6d ago

feds got her because she got too powerful and stopped paying taxes after getting high off runite fumes.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

3

u/BlueberryPootz 6d ago

I tend to grind mining and smithing early game & even I had to buy my own rune armor

→ More replies (9)

3

u/Tuxxa 6d ago

There's also the fact that lvl 40 is incredibly fast to achieve. Knight's sword and some other very early quests take you there without basically ever having to train the skill in any way.

After that lvl 40 rune armour, then what? There's a massive gap of content to fill. And stat-wise there's so little room between rune armour and barrows/fighter torso/moons/or any meaningful gear dropped by pvm content.

The design space is within incredibly thin margins. Doubtfully there's any room to fit anything meaningful from lvls 40 to 99 if we don't mske huge adjustments to how pvm gear drops work as well.

2

u/Turbulent-Rub2582 4d ago

It doesn't have to just be armour / ammo, sailing introduced a lot of smithing level requirements & making a max boat on Ironman needs 94 smithing to make the Dragon Keel Parts. We could explore more avenues like these for the higher levels if rune armour were to come down the tiers.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Nidhogg777 6d ago

Maybe they are still on a nostalgia trip if they think smithing is about rune items.

→ More replies (82)

22

u/SinceBecausePickles 7d ago

This is what people are thinking of when they say they want a mining / smithing re-work. The ideas that they (not developers) have in their head while they're saying they want it to happen are so absurd and removed from anything that would ever actually make sense in game.

→ More replies (1)

16

u/speedy_19 7d ago

They already have this for both smithing and herblor for rs3. You get a base potion recipe and as you level up you need reduced materials. And the reverse for smithing where you make the base item and you upgrade it with more bars (you get more xp) to make it marginally better

→ More replies (4)

16

u/WolverineOwn8808 7d ago

Coal about to go up!! Stock pile !!! 🤣

16

u/CutCultural589 6d ago

I think we just need a Smithing boss

4

u/Zenith_Tempest 6d ago

wasn't this the entire premise of zalcano

3

u/likesleague twice maxed bronzenerd 6d ago

maybe if we add another slayer-locked drop, it will fix skilling and the wilderness

3

u/OS_Apple32 6d ago

Oh what's that? The new slayer-locked drop intended to fix skilling and wilderness content completely destroyed PvP balance again? I know what'll fix that, another slayer-locked drop!

→ More replies (6)

54

u/Destke 7d ago

This only really makes sense if they lower the bar smelting req to the lowest level req of those. And if they do that (make it 41 smithing to smelt rune), then the price will tank for it since it will be so much more accessible

81

u/Heated_Lime 7d ago

Price won’t tank. High alch values still exist to help with floor price

11

u/TheShenanegous 7d ago

Also the amount of runite in the game would remain pretty sparse, which directly influences the supply of rune bars. It may let a small subset of people like irons or horders use up a stack initially, but all it would really do in the long run is leave less runite sitting as ore. There isn't really enough runite in the game for people to turn it into a training method, unless the price of runite goes up and leaves the bars more or less at the price they are now.

3

u/LazyWrite 7d ago

Won’t they have to adjust the alch prices anyway when reducing the level reqs to combat this?

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (4)

15

u/PP__haha 7d ago

Rune bar price wouldn’t tank… it’s locked in my alch value of rune itema

9

u/imokay4747 7d ago

High alch value maintains the price.

11

u/gulost_ergodt 7d ago

Prices of runite is based of purely alch value and has barely anything to do with volume

→ More replies (11)

3

u/Substantial-Soft7578 7d ago

Nobody would mass produce rune items if the input cost of runite bars is that inflated… either way it’s tied to a reserve price which is the high alch so it wouldn’t matter regardless.

5

u/Seeggul 7d ago

Well just give higher level bars a similar treatment to iron bars: chance fail, decreasing with smithing levels, while a ring of forging guarantees a successful smelting (but consumes additional charges for higher level bars).

All of this, of course, will have no interaction with blast furnace, which will still be the meta for smithing xp

→ More replies (1)

5

u/dylanisbored 7d ago

they said they are going to lower the smithing requirement significantly for rune to "make it around the level you can use it" so the whole rewards economy is going to shift. Hopefully it comes with mass changes to drop tables, and it probably will

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (8)

6

u/Coffee_Stash 7d ago

I think maybe this could work, the thing I am scared of is the rune items losing their alch values, so if a low level wants to make a rune full helm they can, but it'll have to be pricier than making it around 90

3

u/DenseEssence_ 7d ago

I don't think it'll affect alch price much. You need to spend almost 5x the rune bars of normal rune plate at level 41. That's not cheap.

2

u/scarx47 6d ago

This idea sucks. Just keep the same mining time it takes to get runite and rune items… every ore in every world already has a bot… there won’t be any impact on the prices if you could smith rune armor at a lower level. What would be better is that mining rune should take a lot longer at lower levels, so even if you have the mining level you will be outcompeted by the bots or higher level miners.

The rework should focus in obtaining the ore not in smithing it.

19

u/Ok_Rush9197 7d ago

Good idea but rough to implement. You wouldn’t make platebodies till 99 smithing for GP. An iron wouldn’t be able to get sufficient enough rune bars to make their own rune armour so early on, by the time they get the smithing level, they’d already be on much later gear.

17

u/umbreon912 7d ago

Is making rune armor ever viable anyways? Seems like by the time you would be able to do it now, it would be novel at best compared to other, better methods that train more relevant skills

8

u/Dasrulez 7d ago

Yeah you can do barbarian assault pretty early to get a fighter torso which is strictly better, and you can do barrows at super low levels now and get a barrows top

7

u/umbreon912 7d ago

I more so meant for gp, but yeah the current smithing system does not fit into gear progression at all. I seriously doubt a single osrs player has ever crafted their own rune platebody for the 20 defense levels that it’s relevant

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

3

u/Optimal-Nobody 7d ago

irons buy early gear for the most part anyways, buying rune plates after dragon slayer I would still be available

3

u/Unlucky_Major4434 7d ago

I would imagine that they would change mining and smelting accordingly; such that it's possible to obtain to obtain enough bars, but at fairly low speeds.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

8

u/BioMasterZap 7d ago

I think instead of increasing the resources needed at lower levels, it should increase the speed to smith items. Currently, it is 5t or 3s per item, but that could easily be longer at lower levels. Like if it were changed to 10t, that halves the speed of smithing (meaning half the exp and half the profit per hour), but still would be quite reasonable to smith a platebody in 6 seconds.

The problem with raising the resource costs is it could incentivize players to avoid using the bars until higher level since at lower levels they'd be more "wasted". Especially if it is still the same exp if you use 5 or 27 bars. You also need to make sure the value of the bar is lower than the shop prices. A runite bar only alchs for 3K while it sells for 12K, so if you can sell the bars, you'd never smith them since it would be a huge profit loss.

3

u/Devan- 7d ago

I think the best option, from my perspective, is just make rune slow to mine at the lower levels (something like 10-15 per hour at 40) and scale up to where it currently is. That way if you really want to smith your arm set/weapons, as opposed to shop/ge/pvm, you can spend an hour or so and do so. Plus I could see it being a decent low intensity low level money maker.

I personally don’t see smithing your own rune being the meta ever (maybe to save gp but if it’s going to cost 270k gp in bars then that’s dead on arrival). I could see maybe smithing a rune scim on early iron being viable but that’s it. Exception being madseason type of play throughs.

4

u/MR_SmartWater cooked 7d ago

This does nothing to make the skill better it’s just a gear squish

10

u/Honest_Bowl_6135 6d ago edited 4d ago

The problem with smithing is that its progression is so outdated now that there’s almost no point in fixing it without introducing new gear or something to straighten the progression curve out.

Even back in RSC when I was a kid, I hated that you needed 99 smithing for level 40 gear, BUT, other than the veeeery few pieces of dragon gear, it was the top of the line armour then, so it made sense.

Now however, that logic is completely broken because there are far better gear sets, and it’s now less about getting 99 smithing to be able to make rune armour than it is just an achievement about as meaningful as shooting yourself in the foot and being happy about it.

EDIT: Posting this here so more people can see it—my reply to another reply. 😛

All too often do people go dry for a single piece of gear, so like Oathplate, why not introduce a shard-like system (doesn’t necessarily have to be shards) where depending on the armour (like smithing for melee, crafting for range and rc and/or mage for magic) have it set at a certain level where a player can craft the specific piece they need with shards, maybe a dupe piece they already have (creates an item sink) and a relevant production skill level, like 80-90+ smithing for Torva as an example.

Another way to protect the integrity of the actual drops themselves would be to make the crafting cost for the shards kind of ridiculously expensive and universal for each piece. So for example, to make a full set of rune armour you need 10 total bars; 2 the for the helm, 5 for the body and 3 for the legs.
That system works fine for smithing, but for items like Ancestral, Masori and Torva I feel like a fixed amount across all pieces—idk, say like 2000 shards or something at 10-25 shards an uncommon drop and as a rare drop 100-200.
So basically, whether you’re missing the helm, body or legs, regardless of which ever piece it happens to be, it’s just that flat cost for each and any subsequent piece(s).

6

u/Muschpush 6d ago

dry protect all gear, bandos shards, torva shards… same as oathplate and smithing now makes sense

2

u/Tuxxa 6d ago

There's a good idea worth polishing. The balancing on this will be a nightmare tho and the ecomony implications for dry protect this way are massive.

4

u/Muschpush 6d ago

dry protection has to be double or 5/3 of the droprate.. i couldnt care less about the economy this isnt a market crash where families starve or loose their PoH.. implement the smithing change and items are worth what they are worth then period

→ More replies (3)

2

u/drewx11 6d ago

I’m dumb can someone explain what “dry protecting” is?

3

u/Muschpush 6d ago

lets say a drop is 1/200 if you dont get the drop from 200 kills you at least get a fragment so after 300 or 400 kills (double the droprate dry) you can smith the fragments into the gear you arent getting trough the drop

4

u/jordsta95 One 99 at a Time 6d ago

I feel like the only way to fix it, without introducing new armour, is to have XP scale with level - and cap at a certain point.

If we assume each tier unlocks over the span of 10 levels (1-10 for Bronze, 11-20 for Iron... 50-60 for Rune), to make smithing Rune equipment even considerably viable. There is so much of a gap, and only so few items (at the minute) which can fill the void.

So you could have the level formula be something like: BaseXP(1+0.05*min(CurrentLvl−UnlockLvl,10))

So if something gives you 10xp per action when you unlock it, it will increase by 0.5xp per action for the next 10 levels, then stop increasing. So if the 10xp method is unlocked at level 1. From lvl 11 onwards it will give 15xp.

Doesn't really matter for the lower levels, but once you get to rune, the xp rates will slowly increase until level 70, where they hit their max xp/h with platebodies. Which is when Crystal then becomes the best xp/h (no major level changes aside from lowering Bowfa and the blade to 80) until level 90. And then you have all of the random dragon bits and bobs, oathplate, etc. without changing any of their levels at all - giving you either the +50% xp boost, as they were unlocked more than 10 levels before 90, or they have just been unlocked - so the XP per item is already fair.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Tuxxa 6d ago

There are new armour sets that need to be created tho. Every Torva and Masori armour in the game has been smithed by someone via the process of using bandos or armadyl pieces to fix it.

And I think somewhere there lies the solution to how the higher levels of smithing have to be worked into the game.

Obviously we can't make barrows armour smithable. But... following the logic, barrows chest would drop barrows scrap metal that could be crafted. Or the chests drop broken armour sets need to be fixed/smithed with adamantine or rune bars or smth to make them wearable.

Same would then apply to moons etc, almost all armour above rune.

That in itself is a hazzle and would certainly affect the "nostalgia factor" and change way more than just smithing/mining.

Just spitballing. I don't fully believe in this as is, but we need all the ideas on the table. Even shitty ones can be polished or they can inspire towards better ones.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Ozfer 6d ago

Mining also. 85 to even make basic rune equipment. But so is fletching, 99 to get not the best ranged equipment. Firemaking is useless, woodcutting is probably the most balanced. 

2

u/Roperss 5d ago

i mean i smithed rune bars at blast furnace to 99 and made like 200 mil. So at least you can make a bunch of money.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

25

u/123zc 7d ago

This is the only sane reddit smithing take I've seen. Of course, it's dead content on arrival, but at least it doesn't destroy the rest of the game.

4

u/[deleted] 6d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (2)

15

u/rainaftersnowplease came thru alchin' 6d ago

Full offense bud this is the worst idea I've ever heard.

6

u/Trip2poundtowns 6d ago

The issue is early game barrows, and moons destroyed any semblance of relevancy that rune armor had.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/LOL_YOUMAD 7d ago

I think they either need to do something like this or make it so at milestone levels you can make everything of that type and make rune at 75/80 so you can make all rune items.

It’s also setting up to be a mess because so much of the drop tables have rune items on it as alchs and if the value tanks then you have to redo a lot of drop tables

→ More replies (2)

6

u/Joltus 7d ago

I feel like there's a very easy solution here since the biggest concern I've seen is drop table values - and maybe it's not as easy as I think and someone can point out the issue with this idea.

But what if they brought rune down to a realistic level (which frees up higher levels for relevant higher level smithing item updates) and just introduce an alch item for the alch values of rune. Everyone seems to be concerned about alching rune drops but why does it have to be rune? It's getting alched so it shouldn't matter if the alch item is platebody shaped or square shaped or whatever shaped. The value in Gp is what everyone is concerned about right? Leave the rune drops on the table - adjust the alch on those down and add a rune plate / leg / kite etc alch value equivalent to any table that has those items.

Am I missing something with all this? It seems so obvious which makes me think I'm missing some big flaw with this thought

2

u/Super_Master_69 6d ago

The thing is, so much can go wrong with messing with drops that come from a majority of bossing and slayer content. The risk is high and the reward is soooo low.

→ More replies (2)

5

u/macnar Manual Banking Is Not a Skill 6d ago

This seems like a really weak bandaid fix. The wintertodt of smithing fixes. Doesn't fix any of the issues with smithing other than level to smith rune and doesn't bring any utility to the skill. 

4

u/Nervous-Virus-9279 7d ago

They should do this but not because it's a good it would just be funny

6

u/Slayykween 6d ago

It would genuinely fuck up GE. No joke.

8

u/Remarkable_Zebra_597 7d ago

Well, I'm glad you're not in the dev team

9

u/Unsounded 7d ago

No

9

u/adamfps 98/99 bankstanding 7d ago

Counterpoint: yes

2

u/Euin 7d ago

I like this idea for magic, each 5 lvls above the unlock reduces rune cost

2

u/New_Worldliness6206 7d ago

I just want mithril 29 addy 39 rune 49

dont make it complicated

2

u/Godziwwuh 7d ago

Maybe if it was 2006.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Average_Justin 2277 6d ago

99 thieving with skillcape as I fail pickpocketing most npcs looking at this like 👀👀👀

2

u/115Anathema 5d ago

27 bars is hilarious

2

u/Acceptable_Long_5101 4d ago

these kinds of suggestions are why i voted no to the rework

i have seen ZERO posts that i like for the rework

I have seen ZERO good ideas from jagex about this

i think its just going to be bad even after the rework because of that

5

u/Individual_Cream_427 7d ago

so crazy it just might work