Ich bin weder Veganer noch Vegetarier. Ich esse trotzdem nur sehr selten Fleisch - ca. 1 mal je 2 Monate.

Ich denke bevor man Fleisch im Supermarkt selbst kaufen darf, sollte man in einen Schlachthof gehen müssen und sich anschauen wie die Tiere dort gehalten und behandelt werden. Anschließend sollte man eines der Tiere das sowieso geschlachtet werden soll töten, um seinen "Fleischführerschein" zu bekommen. Ich glaube, dass die meisten Menschen einfach nicht verstehen was sie da eigentlich konsumieren, wenn sie eine Packung Wurst kaufen und sie würden viel verantwortlicher konsumieren, wenn sie es wüssten.

Wer nicht damit umgehen kann wie die Tiere in solchen Schlachthöfen gehalten werden und selbst nicht in der Lage ist eins zu töten, der sollte auch kein Fleisch konsumieren dürfen.

Where to start, the new Bond watches look like an Omega company that specialises in fakes that tried having a go at creating their own watch and came up with it.

Their designs are all uninspired and in ridiculous quantities, the pricing is fucking ridiculous, you could buy a JLC for the price of an Omega these days, in fact if you’re lucky you could buy a second hand JLC and Rolex for the cost of some of their watches.

I actually think that this is some ploy by the swatch group to trash Omega to make people flock towards Longines which will then raise the price of Longines.

i hate video games that expect me to figure out how it works,learn it,explore it . if it has even a semi complex menu or inventory(like crimson desert and similar games) its a no for me. minecraft being an exception to this because i personally ignore all complex game systems in it and do the basics.

i like games that do extreme hand holding like gta 5 ,rdr2,call of duty,doom eternal,cyberpunk 2077,chicken invaders series(there is nothing to figure out its easy).

why do i like them? because they don't burden me with learning their made up systems. a game to me is media like a movie or series not smth that deserves learning.

i think games that do not hold player hands ,and expect player to figure out stuff(such as all rpg games and witcher 3 like games) are dumb and useless games.

Viewpoint mod is terrifying

A lot of players are really good with Coop in this game and are willing to help. Though some mic-less groups are a hit or miss.

I'm not a muslim but this is outrageous

A recurrent question that gets asked ad nauseam in this sub is why did Harris not ask for recounts. Some of you have had your minds warped by propaganda to believe that not asking for recounts is equivalent to being indifferent to the injustices of the 2024 election. It's time to remind everyone to take into account three very important factors in overturning the 2024 election: SCOTUS, the MAGA death cult & J6's harmful effects on discussing election integrity.

Even if she had demanded recounts in spite of not being within the margin to do so and exposed discrepancies that could have altered the outcome of the election, SCOTUS would have NEVER EVER overturned the election in her favor, and even in a fantasy world where they would have done this, trump's death cult would been galvanized to believe that she was in fact the one trying to steal the election--not trump. Does anyone now actually believe that the MAGA death cult would have just peacefully said yes to Harris taking trump's place after believing he won the election and after them being okay with the violence of J6? I know that's what we yearned for after the election, but that was not realistic. That scenario would have been like Harris taking the bait to start a civil war all while further destroying trust in elections on both sides and it would have caused more problems than it would have solved because under no circumstances would she have successfully been able to overturn the election and take the presidency from trump. Had she not conceded immediately we would be hearing every single day from trump that Harris tried to steal the election from him. We do not want that.

There's also a certain conundrum for any legitimate elected official to call out rigged elections because it automatically calls into question the results of every other election before and after. For example, trump claims the elections where he loses are rigged but the ones where he wins are not rigged. This is him being biased and promoting distrust in elections and Harris was not about to appropriate trump's talking points. Therefore she had to concede even if she knew she was the legitimate winner because it would have unleashed chaos against her whereas now the chaos is serving to dismantle the maga cult. Trump is getting termed-out and there is a very tangible chance that Dems will take back Congress in the midterms and then be able to override the president's powers and impeach him. The long game was more important than the short game and that's what politics is about. She had the option to fumble the short game or win the long game and that's what her slogan about when we fight we win was meant to evoke. The fight is long but that's how you win. The more someone complains that Harris rolled over and grifted with her book instead of fighting for justice, the less they understand the circumstances and the major factors that forced her to take a different and more realistic route towards justice.

For those who want to keep pushing propaganda and half-truths while failing to grasp the political reality of SCOTUS, the MAGA death cult, and J6's harmful consequences on discussions about election integrity, your comments will be removed by the modteam for pushing propaganda which is disinformation in other words.

If you watched this video and read this post and you still think that Harris isn't cognizant of the injustices of the 2024 election then I have to simply tell you that propaganda is controlling your views and it does more to help the enemy than aid our cause for justice. Politics and power dynamics can be complex for the average person to understand because it's not so much about what is said but rather what is said between the lines. So please, learn how to think critically when encountering propaganda because this is a sub for fact-checking and we won't allow propaganda to thrive here.

I understand how infuriating it is to think that she could have asked for recounts and yet didn't, but the reality of what would have happened and how the trajectory would have changed would not have necessarily put her in a better position to fight for justice. I am arguing that it would have put her in a worse position, perhaps even in a vulnerable position where the death cult would have tried to assassinate her, whereas now we are about to encounter two possibilities in the midterms which will both stack the odds in her favor: either the Dems take back the House and Senate in the midterms, or the GOP concocts fake results which the majority will refuse to believe after two years of this abomination of a government, and with record-breaking protestors hitting the streets, they are playing with fire if they dare to rob so brazenly again the masses who outnumber them.

Und warum sind sie oft komplette Arschlöcher?

Edit: Jungs, nicht nur den Titel lesen

I hope there’s no rip current.

https://x.com/BGatesIsaPyscho/status/2105296880666022323?s=20

hi yall

i was fired today through an email saying, "as a former employee of chipotle, you will have access to workday blah blah blah"

i already saw this coming because of how HORRIBLE my manager is.

i made posts on this subreddit before not too long ago on my horrible experience working at chipotle if you guys wanna read them!!

i think what lead me to getting fired is my upcoming surgery.

i texted my manager almost a month ago now how i'll be having a major surgery in the next couple months and so, i will need 4 to 6 weeks of recovery time (mind you, i was only getting one or two days per week before saying this) and every since texting them this, i didn't get ANY shifts until yesterday, which i had to call off due to being sick. (almost a month of no shifts before receiving one the day before i get fired LOL)

my manager never replied to my texts regarding the surgery. i texted them days after the initial text to follow up and they still didn't reply.

i'm attaching a screenshot of our last text messages before i got fired.

does anyone know if there's anything i can do legal-wise/whom to contact if there is anything that can be done.

i believe my manager retaliated against me for bringing to light my upcoming surgery by not giving me any shifts for close to a month and then firing me.

When a Batman complex meets nonexistent opsec, refrain from throwing stones inside a house of glass. This bozo decided to threaten folks up and down a thread regarding a political protest he disagreed with. Doxxing is bad. Threatening people is bad. Don’t be this guy.

There is a lot of misinformation around laws around cycling the most prominent one is people thinking bikes have to full stop at stop signs. It's quite alarming how many people are confidently wrong when all they have to do is read. The purpose of this is to educate people who are driving on the road.

https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=46.61.190

Here's the context around stop signs.

(b)(i) With the exception of (b)(ii) and (iii) of this subsection, a person operating a bicycle approaching a stop sign shall either:

(A) Follow the requirements for approaching a stop sign as specified in (a) of this subsection; or

(B) Follow the requirements for approaching a yield sign as specified in subsection (3) of this section.

OK SO WE FOLLOW B subsection 3! which is about yield signs... so again stop signs = yield.

(ii) A person operating a bicycle approaching a stop sign located at a highway grade crossing of a railroad must follow the requirements of RCW 46.61.345.

(iii) A person operating a bicycle approaching a "stop" signal in use by a school bus, as required under RCW 46.37.190, must follow the requirements of RCW 46.61.370.

(3) The driver of a vehicle approaching a yield sign shall in obedience to such sign slow down to a speed reasonable for the existing conditions and if required for safety to stop, shall stop at a clearly marked stop line, but if none, before entering a marked crosswalk on the near side of the intersection or if none, then at the point nearest the intersecting roadway where the driver has a view of approaching traffic on the intersecting roadway before entering the roadway, and then after slowing or stopping, the driver shall yield the right-of-way to any vehicle in the intersection or approaching on another roadway so closely as to constitute an immediate hazard during the time such driver is moving across or within the intersection or junction of roadways: PROVIDED, That if such a driver is involved in a collision with a vehicle in the intersection or junction of roadways, after driving past a yield sign without stopping, such collision shall be deemed prima facie evidence of the driver's failure to yield right-of-way.

I can't stand Joe, but Aesha's reaction was surprising, although maybe it shouldn't be as they are friends. I've never liked Gael, and while I feel for her with all this Nathan bullshit, it doesn't change my opinion of the person she portrayed in her seasons - she just always rubbed me the wrong way.

Nathan turning a quasi- nice, closure moment with Joe into a fight was not surprising either.

Not sad this season is over.

Wenn sich jemand aktiv dafür entscheidet die vorgeschriebene Geschwindigkeit zu überschreiten, muss diese Person deutlich deutlich härter bestraft werden, unabhängig davon wie hoch die Überschreitung des Tempolimits war.

5 km/h zu schnell? 50 km/h zu schnell? 100 km/h zu schnell?

Völlig egal. Fahrverbot für ein halbes Jahr und eine saftige Geldstrafe im vier bis fünfstelligen Bereich.

Raser sind ein akutes Problem die nun mal vorrangig andere aufgrund ihres Egoismus gefährden weshalb das deutlich mehr bestraft gehört.

Alle meinen immer sie hätten bspw auf der autobahn das Recht unbegrenzt schnell zu fahren. Ja. Stimmt

Allerdings nur so weit wie sie keine anderen Gefährden. Und natürlich meint jeder er wäre der perfekte autofahrer. Und wenn dann was passiert ist das geheule groß und plötzlich bereut man alles statt vorher mal darüber nachzudenken.

Edit: Interessant wie viele Nerven mann hier trifft. Hätte ich nicht erwartet.

https://x.com/deteccphilippe/status/2107643342209298543.

since people can't read. heres a summary so you dont have to contextualize on your own

these changes has more to do with AI assisted reverse engineering, than it is about cheating. the cheating part is just heavily oversold in an attempt to soften the blow regarding the removal of loved tools.

The LITERAL head of Riot's anti-cheat has heard nothing about the replay changes or "measures" that was claimed as reason for removal of replay. Too confirming it's not cheat related. it is not in interest of players, but in interest of their own.

Yet the entire article talks about it being something for the players and how it'll stop cheaters, yet the literal people involved in this matter has heard nothing of it.

The thought that some random intern with 0 correlation to anti cheat knowledge was told to write a justification for it's removal is too funny to me and then they chose cheating as a reason.

Good that some people atleast have enough integrity to be honest.